On my last blog entry, I wrote about predatory resellers and after that,
we received lots of opinions and suggestions about the matter. Thank
you for your ideas, thoughts and consideration.
Almost all the puzzlers who sent us do not welcome predatory resellers
and flippers. Only a few people told us that resellers can increase
their chance to acquire rare puzzles. Though they are also not happy to
pay for a puzzle two or three times more than the original price. People
who can pay two or three times more for a puzzle is limited as well.
Now, I have been thinking of releasing the next SD puzzles in the
following way. For example, let's say I have 150 puzzle products to sell
at the regular price of $500.
- Sell the first 10 puzzles at the price of $750, meaning each buyer pays an extra 50% to purchase the very same puzzle.
- Sell the next 70 puzzles at the price of $500 twelve hours later.
- Sell the next 65 puzzles at the price of $500 another twelve hours later.
- The last five puzzles will be kept and sold depending on situation.
Maybe, we could put one of the last five puzzles up for auction when we
notice someone is trying to sell the same puzzle on an auction. Thus,
the winning bid will be decreased, the auction winners will pay less and
the flipper gains less.
We can also contact a person who is willing to pay an extra 50% for a
puzzle. If the person who doesn't mind paying two or three times more
than the regular price at an auction, an extra 50% is a bargain. The
person who accepts our offer doesn't have to join an auction and it
might help to reduce the winning bids on future auctions. I can also
choose who should get one of the last five puzzles. We often find that
the released puzzles at popular web shops are sold out within minutes
and people who don't have good reflexes or IT skill may lose the chance
all the time. Giving an opportunity to those people wouldn't be unfair.
To hold a competing auction to discourage the resellers, the best way
will be to set up an auction by ourselves adding an app to our server.
It will cost an additional USD $360 annually, but the cost will be covered
by extra income. Or use eBay auction like we occasionally do. Although
we will lose an extra 10% as the eBay fee, it will be covered as well.
We, again, appreciate your thoughts about the above plan. If the idea is
supported by the majority of our customers, I will take this option. If
not, we will release the next puzzle splitting the total amount into
I should mention about the ideas that were sent from several customers.
Putting serial numbers may discourage the intention to resell the
puzzle. It also helps to track who is selling the puzzle but I will make
lots of mistakes by doing so. Why I made the branding iron is I don't
have confidence with hand writing. I might spell Juno as Jumo. There is a
good chances I would write the same serial number twice. Adding non
essential information to the puzzle is also not to my taste.
I totally agree that determining the predatory reseller is difficult and
misjudging can cause a problem. I still think that a sort of three
strike rule is plausible. If three or more people tell us and pinpoint who is the predatory reseller, the reseller might be eliminated from purchasing our puzzle products.
At last, there is good chance that we can release the next SD puzzle this July. It was a long journey and a bit more to go.